Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
// 2. Then hijack the function that receives encrypted audio
，详情可参考同城约会
在2025云栖大会上，DataWorks 发布多项重磅能力，全面升级为面向开源湖仓的智能数据开发治理平台。依托 Data Lake Formation（DLF） 与统一元数据服务，实现结构化、半结构化及非结构化数据的统一管理。新增多模态数据管理、ChatBI、Data+AI 开发 Notebook 等模块，结合 Serverless Spark 引擎优化，大幅提升开发效率与资源利用率。
Что думаешь? Оцени!